Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [proto] Recent (rvalue support) changes in proto causes a whole bunch of regressions in Spirit
From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-10-31 08:52:28

Next message: Thorsten Ottosen: "Re: [boost] Interest in bounded (Top-Bounded) Range adaptor."
Previous message: Fernando Pelliccioni: "Re: [boost] Interest in bounded (Top-Bounded) Range adaptor."
In reply to: Eric Niebler: "Re: [boost] [proto] Recent (rvalue support) changes in proto causes a whole bunch of regressions in Spirit"

> On 10/20/2011 10:00 AM, Adam Merz wrote:
> > Joel de Guzman <joel <at> boost-consulting.com> writes:
> > <snip>
> >> Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems the changes in proto forces us
> >> to support rvalue refs, but we are not ready for that yet and it's
> >> too late in the release cycle.
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >
> > Out of curiosity, is there any update on this?
>
> I believe the issue was resolved by making downstream changes in Spirit.

Yep, this was fixed in Spirit 2 weeks ago.

Regards Hartmut
---------------
http://boost-spirit.com
http://stellar.cct.lsu.edu

Next message: Thorsten Ottosen: "Re: [boost] Interest in bounded (Top-Bounded) Range adaptor."
Previous message: Fernando Pelliccioni: "Re: [boost] Interest in bounded (Top-Bounded) Range adaptor."
In reply to: Eric Niebler: "Re: [boost] [proto] Recent (rvalue support) changes in proto causes a whole bunch of regressions in Spirit"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk