Subject: Re: [boost] [smart_ptr] scoped_array / shared_array (size_t) constructor
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-01 12:20:24
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Richard Hadsell
> On 11/01/2011 12:00 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> Actually, what is the problem?
>> Do you use (NULL) or (0) instead of just () (for construction).
> I would have to check through a lot of code, not just my own, to look for
> places that are initialized with 0. I would expect to see this in
> initializers for data members that were formerly simple pointers.
Adding a (size_t) constructor would produce ambiguity errors, but
those are easy to fix by using the default constructor instead. Would
that be acceptable?