Subject: Re: [boost] [Range] Confusing result of iterator_range::size()
From: Sergey Voropaev (serge-voropaev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-03 04:12:16
Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. <jeffrey.hellrung <at> gmail.com> writes:
> This came up just recently, e.g.,
Sorry, I miss it. Good discussion. And now we have my example with compilation
> I think the end result was an agreement that
> typedef typename boost::make_unsigned< difference_type >::type size_type
> would be a valid definition of size_type, so the only argument against
> making the change that I can see is breaking existing code (probably
> unlikely...?) and...inertia.
I did not find authors of "Range" in the discussion. I am afraid your fix will
be missed. It is good idea to write formal bug. Can you do it?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk