Subject: Re: [boost] [Range] Confusing result of iterator_range::size()
From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-03 09:51:31
Den 03-11-2011 13:16, Olaf van der Spek skrev:
>> If you can find it, I might believe you. It should be in the archieves from
>> some years ago.
> I meant the discussion last month.
> Didn't know it was discussed before. Do you have any idea in what year/month?
A couple of years maybe. I think it happened at the same time we
demanded that size(Rng) only worked for RandomAccessRanges and that this
function also returns a signed type.
Using the old docs, one can probably track down the approximate time.
The bottom line is that it was a deliberate decision. The example put
is not portable either.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk