Subject: Re: [boost] [smart_ptr] scoped_array / shared_array (size_t) constructor
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-04 11:51:12
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Richard Hadsell
> On 11/01/2011 12:20 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> Adding a (size_t) constructor would produce ambiguity errors, but
>> those are easy to fix by using the default constructor instead. Would
>> that be acceptable?
> That sounds like a good idea.
Great. Does anyone else have comments / concerns about a (size_t) constructor?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk