Subject: Re: [boost] Fw: [atomic] review results
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-08 06:22:36
Andrey Semashev wrote:
> I think, support for multi-module applications is a must for both
> but Boost.SmartPtr is more lucky in that regard since it requires more
> spread atomic ops to operate, so the shared spinlock pool is unlikely to
> become an issue.
shared_ptr requires CAS, and if you have CAS, you have everything. It only
needs to operate on single word integers though.
Either way, it doesn't matter much because the "multi-module" platform is
Windows, and shared_ptr doesn't use the spinlock pool for the reference
count on Windows. It does use it for the atomic access functions though.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk