Subject: Re: [boost] [1.48.0] Status?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-08 12:19:53
On 11/08/2011 08:54 AM, John Maddock wrote:
>> tr1 (most or all compilers)
> Well I confess I've paid no attention to TR1 because there have been no
> changes.... however, it appears that the TR1 random number tests are
> failing on all compilers, for which I suspect a breaking change to
> Boost.Random. Steven?
It's the seeding algorithm. Seeding
was a mess before, but apparently in
cleaning it up I decided differently
from TR1. (I was just going by the
standard, which doesn't have floating