Subject: Re: [boost] [1.48.0] Status?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-08 12:19:53
On 11/08/2011 08:54 AM, John Maddock wrote:
>> tr1 (most or all compilers)
> Well I confess I've paid no attention to TR1 because there have been no
> changes.... however, it appears that the TR1 random number tests are
> failing on all compilers, for which I suspect a breaking change to
> Boost.Random. Steven?
It's the seeding algorithm. Seeding
was a mess before, but apparently in
cleaning it up I decided differently
from TR1. (I was just going by the
standard, which doesn't have floating
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk