Subject: Re: [boost] Fw: [atomic] review results
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-08 13:53:16
On Tuesday, November 08, 2011 10:17:20 Tim Blechmann wrote:
> hi helge,
> > Another option that I have considered would be "piggy-backing" the
> > spinlock
> > pool into Boost.Thread -- the idea is that an application is either
> > single-threaded, or if it is multi-threaded it is expected to link with
> > Boost.Thread (even if nothing from Boost.Thread is used indeed, yes
> > makes
> > me feel uneasy as well).
> this would imply that boost.thread cannot be used as static library any
I was under impression that in multi-module applications Boost.Thread had to
be linked in as a shared library anyway. Am I wrong?