Subject: Re: [boost] Fw: [atomic] review results
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-08 14:16:51
Andrey Semashev wrote:
On Tuesday, November 08, 2011 13:19:22 Peter Dimov wrote:
> > "Doesn't support multi-module applications" is not the same as not
> > supporting sharing an atomic between DLLs. Many multi-module
> > applications
> > will never need to do that. I can't think of an example that isn't
> > either
> > contrived or a bad idea.
> Yes, I meant atomic<> crossing DLL boundaries, of course. However, I don't
> find such use cases contrived or bad.
Can you give an example?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk