Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [1.48.0] Status?
From: Richard Webb (richard.webb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-10 06:52:23

Next message: Vicente Botet: "Re: [boost] [iostreams][io_state_savers] Request for interest in some ios_base basic utilities"
Previous message: Artyom Beilis: "Re: [boost] [iostreams][io_state_savers] Request for interest in some ios_base basic utilities"
In reply to: Beman Dawes: "[boost] [1.48.0] Status?"
Next in thread: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [1.48.0] Status?"
Reply: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [1.48.0] Status?"

Beman Dawes <bdawes <at> acm.org> writes:

>
> pool (all Windows compilers)
>

The Windows Pool failures are in the "valgrind_config_check" test, which appears
to just test if Valgrind is installed.

I guess that this can be marked as an expected failure, given that Valgrind
doesn't work on Windows?

Next message: Vicente Botet: "Re: [boost] [iostreams][io_state_savers] Request for interest in some ios_base basic utilities"
Previous message: Artyom Beilis: "Re: [boost] [iostreams][io_state_savers] Request for interest in some ios_base basic utilities"
In reply to: Beman Dawes: "[boost] [1.48.0] Status?"
Next in thread: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [1.48.0] Status?"
Reply: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [1.48.0] Status?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk