Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Are some of the trunk regression tests running in C++0x mode when they shouldn't be?
From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-10 15:13:46

Next message: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "Re: [boost] [iostreams][io_state_savers] Request for interest in some ios_base basic utilities"
Previous message: Artyom Beilis: "Re: [boost] [iostreams][io_state_savers] Request for interest in some ios_base basic utilities"
In reply to: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [boost] Are some of the trunk regression tests running in C++0x mode when they shouldn't be?"
Next in thread: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "Re: [boost] Are some of the trunk regression tests running in C++0x mode when they shouldn't be?"
Reply: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "Re: [boost] Are some of the trunk regression tests running in C++0x mode when they shouldn't be?"

Steven Watanabe <watanabesj <at> gmail.com> writes:
> > Looks like -std=c++0x is being specified when it shouldn't for some reason?
> > Is something broken, or am i imagining it?
> >
>
> This is a problem in Boost.Test as of r75372.

How should I specify in Jamfile that I want to require c++11 support from gcc
starting with version a.b.c?

Gennadiy

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk