Subject: Re: [boost] [optional] std::tr2::optional
From: Andrzej Krzemienski (akrzemi1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-19 05:27:23
> > 3. T is neither copyable nor moveable -- it is like a scope guard, or
> > boost::scoped_ptr. In this case optional<T> still provides assignment
> > making a "pseudo destructor call" followed by a call to placement new.
-- > > but this gives only basic guarantee. > The guarantee is strong if the placement delete/new are marked > noexcept, isn't it? What I meant by "a >>pseudo destructor call<< followed by a call to placement new." is a call to destructor w/o releasing the memory and then a call to constructor w/o allocating memory: ob.~T(); new (&ob) T( std::forward<Args>(args)... ); This trick will provide a strong guarantee if destructor and the constructor are nothrow. While destructors usually are non-throwing, it is rather unlikely that constructors would not throw: it is the constructors that we often expect to throw in case of initialization failure. Regards, &rzej
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk