Re: [boost] [optional] std::tr2::optional

Subject: Re: [boost] [optional] std::tr2::optional
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-20 03:23:06

On Saturday, November 19, 2011 18:26:25 Andrzej Krzemienski wrote:

> Also, if someone likes the assignment-of-"none" syntax, in C++11 there will
> be a similar syntax available:
> 
> std::tr2::optional<T> op = {};
> op = {};

Wouldn't that be confusing with creating a filled optional with the value 
constructed with empty initialization list? If there is assignment-of-none 
syntax, it should probably be more explicit, pretty much like the current 
"none" keyword.