Subject: Re: [boost] New libraries implementing C++11 features in C++03
From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-23 07:02:45
On 11/23/2011 7:43 PM, Gregory Crosswhite wrote:
> Just to be clear, what you quoted was my response to the apparent argument that Local
> doesn't belong in Boost for the reason that we should be using Lambda/Phoenix instead,
> with the justification being that the essence of the Boost project is to have us use
> libraries that give us bad experiences so that we can provide feedback based on these
> experiences to improve C++ compilers. I was not trying to argue that Boost should
> accept every library that provides useful functionality in the present without regard
> for its impact on the future of Boost.
Sigh. This is hopeless. Anyway, I've said enough and I rest my case.
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://boost-spirit.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk