Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost.Local] Review
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-24 06:46:00
On 24 November 2011 10:47, Joel de Guzman <joel_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 11/24/2011 6:37 PM, Dean Michael Berris wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Joel Falcou <joel.falcou_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> Then, th etool for fixing them are there, static-assert and concept check
>>> are working rather nicely once you actually use them.
Do that then. Fix these problems and you'll prove me wrong. Wouldn't
that be nice?
>> Although I've always thought that bad error messages were because
>> current compilers suck at making intelligible error messages.
Not an easy problem to fix. Most people are more concerned with
getting shiny new features than usability.
> It saddens me to see TMP-phobia creeping into Boost, of all places! :(
To use something effectively requires understanding the disadvantages.
You can't wish them away with a silly label. If people find something
difficult to use, then it is difficult to use.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk