Subject: Re: [boost] New libraries implementing C++11 features in C++03
From: Gregory Crosswhite (gcrosswhite_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-24 10:52:07
On Nov 25, 2011, at 1:05 AM, Dean Michael Berris wrote:
> What are you talking about? There's *exactly* the same number of lines in a local function as
> there is with a class/namespace function. What am I missing?
Nothing, I think that I misread your argument as a general argument against long functions rather than against having non-trivial local functions within another function, which is why my response was off; my bad. In fairness you then responded to me by telling me a bunch of basic stuff about programming that I already know and practice as if I somehow must never have heard of these things before, merely because I said that I occasionally have longs function in my code that I don't go out of my way to break up out of a sense of dogmatism that they should never exist, so I'll call it even. :-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk