Re: [boost] New libraries implementing C++11 features in C++03

Subject: Re: [boost] New libraries implementing C++11 features in C++03
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-24 16:36:17

AMDG

On 11/24/2011 12:43 PM, Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. wrote:
> 
> More than anything, I just want to let everyone know that I'm closely
> following this thread (and related threads) to help me make a decision on
> Local.  I was hoping this discussion would also clarify the position Boost
> takes on similar libraries.  However, clearly, whatever decision I make is
> going to be quite polarizing, and, honestly, I don't think it's a decision
> *I* should make; the community appears to be having difficulty coming to
> anything resembling a consensus :/
> 

You're the review manager.  You have to take
responsibility for making this decision.  No
one else is going to do it for you, nor is Boost
some kind of magic entity that gives reviews
a "correct" result even when the reviewers
vehemently disagree among themselves.

> Personally, going into this review, I thought Local was a shoe-in for
> acceptance.  But I feel like those against inclusion have brought up some
> very good points.
> 

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe