|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] Library categories
From: Christophe Henry (christophe.j.henry_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-24 16:52:44
> >On 23 November 2011 18:08, Vicente J. Botet Escriba
> ><vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> Have you a concrete proposal of categories that can be merged or removed?
>
> Not really, I'm very happy to leave this to you ;). Apart from Idioms
> and Patterns, I was thinking about 'State Machines' but I don't have a
> better place for them so maybe they should stay. From the old
> categories 'parsing' is already covered by "Strings and text
> processing" so I'd remove that. I'd merge the two metaprogramming
> categories as well.
Why to classify by subject when the subject is too narrow (like state
machines or parsing)?
For example, (proto-based) DSEL could be nice. I would see:
- proto (of course!)
- msm
- spirit
- phoenix
- xpressive
- whatever I have forgotten
Just a suggestion.
Christophe
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk