Subject: [boost] [local] Any "active Boost library author" in favor of Boost.Local?
From: Lorenzo Caminiti (lorcaminiti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-24 19:29:39
I will be honest: The fact that some of the people arguing for not
including Boost.Local are "active Boost library authors" (Thomas,
Joel, and Hartmut) seems to make their opinion weight more than the
opinion of others that have also submitted a review for the library.
1) Should reviews from "active Boost library authors" carry more
weight? (This is /not/ a rhetoric question.)
2) Is there any "active Boost library author" out there that is in
favor of including Boost.Local? (If so, please say so by replying to
Thanks a lot :)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk