Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [local] Any "active Boost library author" in favor of Boost.Local?
From: Lorenzo Caminiti (lorcaminiti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-25 11:55:40

Next message: Nathan Ridge: "Re: [boost] New libraries implementing C++11 features in C++03"
Previous message: Lorenzo Caminiti: "Re: [boost] New libraries implementing C++11 features in C++03"
In reply to: Vicente Botet: "Re: [boost] [local] Any "active Boost library author" in favor of Boost.Local?"
Next in thread: Lorenzo Caminiti: "Re: [boost] [local] Any "active Boost library author" in favor of Boost.Local?"

On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Vicente Botet
<vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> So, I vote for no acceptance of Boost.Local.
>
> Sorry for the change,

It's OK. I'm actually happy that the (stressful) discussion is at
least helpful to clarify someone's decision one way or the other :)

--Lorenzo

Next message: Nathan Ridge: "Re: [boost] New libraries implementing C++11 features in C++03"
Previous message: Lorenzo Caminiti: "Re: [boost] New libraries implementing C++11 features in C++03"
In reply to: Vicente Botet: "Re: [boost] [local] Any "active Boost library author" in favor of Boost.Local?"
Next in thread: Lorenzo Caminiti: "Re: [boost] [local] Any "active Boost library author" in favor of Boost.Local?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk