Re: [boost] [local] Any "active Boost library author" in favor of Boost.Local?

Subject: Re: [boost] [local] Any "active Boost library author" in favor of Boost.Local?
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-25 12:32:18

Le 25/11/11 18:18, Lorenzo Caminiti a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Vicente Botet
> <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]>  wrote:
>> * access to the non public functions of the embedding class (in case of a
>> local function of a member function).
> Can you explain this point better? This example shows that you can
> access public, protected, and private members of a bound object (from
> within a member of the same class):
>
> #include<boost/local/function.hpp>
> #include<iostream>
>
> struct x {
>      void f() {
>          void BOOST_LOCAL_FUNCTION_PARAMS(bind this) {
>              this_->priv();
>              this_->prot();
>              this_->publ();
>          } BOOST_LOCAL_FUNCTION_NAME(l)
>          l();
>      }
>
> public:
>      void publ() { std::cout<<  "public"<<  std::endl; }
> protected:
>      void prot() { std::cout<<  "protected"<<  std::endl; }
> private:
>      void priv() { std::cout<<  "private"<<  std::endl; }
> };
>
> int main ( ) {
>      x xx;
>      xx.f();
>      return 0;
> }
Sorry, I miss Boost.Local was able to do that. Where in the 
documentation can I find the local function can access the non-public 
interface?

Best,
Vicente