Subject: Re: [boost] [thread] [rfc] patch to change condition_variable and mutex error checks
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-30 16:51:21
Brett Lentz wrote:
> Patch is attached.
> I'd like to get some comments about this patch. Does it seem
> reasonable enough to accept? Is there a better way to handle it?
> BOOST_VERIFY aborts on EINTR, but EINTR is usually not fatal, it just
> means you need to try later.
You've attached the wrong patch. Anyway, POSIX specifically forbids pthread
functions from returning EINTR.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk