Re: [boost] Is there any interest in a library which solves C++ class reflection feature just like Java does?

Subject: Re: [boost] Is there any interest in a library which solves C++ class reflection feature just like Java does?
From: Roman Perepelitsa (roman.perepelitsa_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-12-07 07:51:18

2011/12/7 Vicente J. Botet Escriba <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]>

> So please, don't start a discussion stating that we need a
> compile-time/run-time or c++11/c++98 library. All the combinations have its
> usage, each one with its advantages and liabilities.
>

Point is that it's possible to build runtime reflection on top of
compile-time reflection, but the opposite isn't true. One can even claim
that runtime reflection *must* be implemented on top of compile-time
reflection, so proposing *just* runtime reflection is pointless.

Roman Perepelitsa.