Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Math and Math Constants
From: Joel Falcou (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-12-07 16:31:00
Le 07/12/2011 22:15, Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. a écrit :
> How about simply
conflicts with mpl::_1, boost::_1 and all other lambda liekplacehodler
> then? *if* it's deemed desirable to have such constants in the first
> place. I.e., in what instances are the corresponding literals insufficient?
Constant placeholder for integer make little sense, they make for real
constant with non trivial vlaue and representation : pi, gold, etc ...
In NT2 we decided to have everything a functor (constant included) and
forward them to free function. This allow us to have both functionnal
and object like interface for them.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk