Subject: Re: [boost] Add macros for the "enum class" concept?
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-12-15 06:49:40
on Mon Dec 12 2011, Vicente Botet <vicente.botet-AT-wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> Daryle Walker wrote
>>> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:55:33 +0000
>>> From: dnljms@
>>> On 12 December 2011 12:46, Daryle Walker <darylew@> wrote:
>>> > Should we add preprocessor stuff to conditionally use the C++11 "enum
>>> class" construct?
>>> We have something like that already:
>> Reading it, it doesn't have any base type and/or forward-declaration
> How do you want to be able to use forward declaration in a portable way?
> There are also scoped enums with underlying type that are no enum class.
Not in C++11. There are unscoped enums with underlying type, but the
way you get scoping is to use "enum class."
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk