Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [parameter] type predicates vs. concepts
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-12-15 07:19:08

Next message: Dave Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Standard library Technical Report 2 proposals for Boost libraries"
Previous message: Dave Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [python] [concept] CallPolicies implementation"
In reply to: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr.: "Re: [boost] [parameter] type predicates vs. concepts"
Next in thread: Dave Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [parameter] type predicates vs. concepts"

on Sun Dec 04 2011, "Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr." <jeffrey.hellrung-AT-gmail.com> wrote:

> Also, the error message typically generated for a failed Boost.Concept
> assertion might be more desirable than that for a failing to find a
> compatible overload due to the use of SFINAE and metafunctions.

Good point.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com

Next message: Dave Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Standard library Technical Report 2 proposals for Boost libraries"
Previous message: Dave Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [python] [concept] CallPolicies implementation"
In reply to: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr.: "Re: [boost] [parameter] type predicates vs. concepts"
Next in thread: Dave Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [parameter] type predicates vs. concepts"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk