Subject: Re: [boost] Add macros for the "enum class" concept?
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-12-18 05:46:48
Le 17/12/11 23:12, Dave Abrahams a écrit :
> on Thu Dec 15 2011, Vicente Botet<vicente.botet-AT-wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>> IMO scope and convertibility are orthogonal. Do you know why this
>> combination was not retained?
> I'm afraid that I don't even understand your question... but even if I
> did, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't know the answer.
Why C++11 doesn't supports scoped enums with underlying type that are
implicitly convertible to the underlying type?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk