Subject: Re: [boost] boost modularisation status?
From: Sergey Popov (loonycyborg_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-01-02 07:38:46
On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 19:47:29 -0500
Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Sorry if this is a stupid question...
> > I understand the purpose of modularizing the library, but what is
> > the purpose of simultaneously porting the build system from
> > Boost.Build to CMake?
> Not a stupid question at all. Doing these two things separately might
> have been a better idea, but that's not the way it has gone.
I for one would never contribute to a project requiring me to use cmake.
I'd probably pay more attention to the modularization effort otherwise.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk