Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] "protected" APIs
From: Thomas Heller (thom.heller_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-01-04 10:19:08

Next message: Jarrad Waterloo: "Re: [boost] Is there any interest in a Group of library like to Application System!"
Previous message: Thomas Heller: "Re: [boost] [Boost.Lambda] Some new features are suggested: return, iterating yield, & local var"
In reply to: Lorenzo Caminiti: "[boost] "protected" APIs"
Next in thread: lcaminiti: "[boost] [closure] name (was: Re: "protected" APIs)"
Reply: lcaminiti: "[boost] [closure] name (was: Re: "protected" APIs)"
Reply: Hartmut Kaiser: "Re: [boost] "protected" APIs"

On 01/02/2012 10:25 AM, Lorenzo Caminiti wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Boost.Closure (formerly, Boost.Local) needs to use some macros, types,
> etc that are currently marked private in Boost.ScopeExit:

Boost.Closure? I really don't like that name is at implies functional
programming capabilities. Didn't you decide to name it
Boost.LocalFunction instead?

Next message: Jarrad Waterloo: "Re: [boost] Is there any interest in a Group of library like to Application System!"
Previous message: Thomas Heller: "Re: [boost] [Boost.Lambda] Some new features are suggested: return, iterating yield, & local var"
In reply to: Lorenzo Caminiti: "[boost] "protected" APIs"
Next in thread: lcaminiti: "[boost] [closure] name (was: Re: "protected" APIs)"
Reply: lcaminiti: "[boost] [closure] name (was: Re: "protected" APIs)"
Reply: Hartmut Kaiser: "Re: [boost] "protected" APIs"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk