Subject: Re: [boost] Request for Interest in several Modules
From: Christian Holmquist (c.holmquist_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-01-10 14:12:50
On 10 January 2012 11:16, Mathias Gaunard <mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden]>wrote:
> On 01/10/2012 04:29 PM, Marshall Clow wrote:
>> On Jan 10, 2012, at 7:11 AM, Artyom Beilis wrote:
>>> Collecting stack trace automatically from exception and printing it.
>>> Very Very useful for debugging.
>>> Any interest in this library. It works (collects a trace and prints
>>> it) on:
>>> Windows, Solaris, Linux, Mac OS X
>> This would be a great (feature) addition for Boost.Exception; the ability
>> to attach a stack trace to an exception showing where it was thrown.
Extremely useful. We make extensive use of in house 'developed' (i.e.
assembled from myriads small snippets on the web) stacktrace classes.
> As you say, very, very useful for debugging
> Why not just use a debugger?
They can give backtraces as well.
It's for when you don't have a debugger attached, or don't want to stop
your program from continued execution:
* To log callstacks from a running program doesn't infer (very much) with
its execution, such as would halting it. For large systems more powerful
* Production (server) environments can't be halted and debugged due to an
exception, but retrieving the stacktrace will aid in later error analysis.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk