Subject: Re: [boost] Bug reports - Showstoppers and Regressions
From: Torsten Maehne (Torsten.Maehne_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-01-17 12:23:59
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:00:21 -0800, Marshall Clow wrote:
> There are a couple of useful reports on svn.boost.org:
> Active Showstoppers: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/report/43 Active
> Regressions: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/report/30
> To shortcut part of the discussion, here are some definitions (taken
> from https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/TicketWorkflow):
> â¢ Showstopper - this problem is so bad, that we should hold up a
> release if it's not fixed. Note that the release managers and/or
> library maintainers may have different opinions.
> â¢ Regression - something used to work (in a previous release),
> longer does.
> IMHO, these bugs should be at least looked at before each release.
concerning regressions in Boost.Test, ticket #6331 "g++ compilation error
due to ambiguity between template<class Cond, class T> struct
boost::enable_if and class boost::unit_test::decorator::enable_if as well
as the disable_if counterparts introduced after Boost 1.48.0 (up to at
least svn rev. 76217)" <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6331> is
quite annoying, as it makes Boost.Test unusable with all libraries, which
make use of boost::enable_if<Cond, T> and don't fully qualify the
namespace boost::. This affects also several Boost libraries, e.g.,
Boost.Spirit. This breaking change was introduced after the Boost 1.48
> -- Marshall
> Marshall Clow Idio Software <mailto:mclow.lists_at_[hidden]>
> A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95 Theses to the church door and is
> promptly moderated down to (-1, Flamebait).
> -- Yu Suzuki
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk