Re: [boost] [optional] generates unnessesary code for trivial types

Subject: Re: [boost] [optional] generates unnessesary code for trivial types
From: Nevin Liber (nevin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-01-27 17:14:08

On 27 January 2012 10:32, Domagoj Saric <domagoj.saric_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Hi, I've recently created an improved internal version of boost::optional to
> help workaround two issues:
>  - suboptimal codegen
>  - concurrent access.

Your changes sound interesting!  (I'm not as sure about the
"concurrent access" stuff, but only because I haven't given it much
thought yet.)

Regards,
-- 
 Nevin ":-)" Liber  <mailto:nevin_at_[hidden]>  [phone]