Subject: Re: [boost] [range] Performance benchmarks?
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-02-01 18:28:51
On 02/01/2012 10:19 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> on Wed Feb 01 2012, Mathias Gaunard<mathias.gaunard-AT-ens-lyon.org> wrote:
>> On 02/01/2012 04:39 PM, Beman Dawes wrote:
>>> A question came up in a long bikeshed discussion on a C++ committee
>>> mailing list as to the performance of range based interface versus a
>>> begin/end iterator interface (I.E. traditional STL interface) to the
>>> same algorithms.
>> It's exactly the same performance, because a range is just a pair of
>> begin/end iterators and all the code is implemented using the
> No, a range is not _necessarily_ a pair of begin/end iterators.
They are in Boost, and in particular in Boost.Range, which was being
asked about here.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk