Subject: Re: [boost] [range] Performance benchmarks?
From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-02-02 05:02:46
Den 01-02-2012 18:02, Mathias Gaunard skrev:
> On 02/01/2012 04:39 PM, Beman Dawes wrote:
>> A question came up in a long bikeshed discussion on a C++ committee
>> mailing list as to the performance of range based interface versus a
>> begin/end iterator interface (I.E. traditional STL interface) to the
>> same algorithms.
> It's exactly the same performance, because a range is just a pair of
> begin/end iterators and all the code is implemented using the iterators.
I have to say, I haven't compared the generated assembler.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk