Re: [boost] [filesystem] windows/posix inconsistencies.

Subject: Re: [boost] [filesystem] windows/posix inconsistencies.
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-02-02 09:18:18

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Thorsten Ottosen
<thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I guess with the new & (I don't know of any compilers that have implemented
> it yet) feature we could have these overloads in path:
>
> const string& string() const;
> string        string() const &&;
>
> so when a temporary path object is returned from path::extension(), the
> second overload is selected.

Interesting! I'm clueless about that use of &&. Need to do some reading.

Thanks,

--Beman