Subject: Re: [boost] [hash] regular behaviour of hash function for double values
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-02-02 17:29:17
On 1 February 2012 21:39, Topher Cooper <topher_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> So your suggestion is that if they discover a problem that requires a
> different performance trade-off, that they should be expected to either
> rewrite their code or write an interface adaptor, instead of being expected
> to rewrite a few lines of hash function code to meet their needs?
No, my suggestion is that they do whatever floats their boat.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk