Re: [boost] [hash] regular behaviour of hash function for double values

Subject: Re: [boost] [hash] regular behaviour of hash function for double values
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-02-02 17:29:17

On 1 February 2012 21:39, Topher Cooper <topher_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> So your suggestion is that if they discover a problem that requires a
> different performance trade-off, that they should be expected to either
> rewrite their code or write an interface adaptor, instead of being expected
> to rewrite a few lines of hash function code to meet their needs?

No, my suggestion is that they do whatever floats their boat.