Re: [boost] PCL - Portable C++ Library

Subject: Re: [boost] PCL - Portable C++ Library
From: Klaim - Joël Lamotte (mjklaim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-02-10 11:10:37

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 15:14, Dominique Devienne <ddevienne_at_[hidden]>wrote:

> C++ would have to
> evolve a *lot* to replace MOC (or code-based code generators in
> general).
>

[offtopic]
Actually, there is a proposition to add "rich pointers" to the language (by
proposed boost.network library, aka cppnetlib, author) that is meant to
provide a way to get introspection to solve this problem.
Some references :
http://www.cplusplus-soup.com/2012/01/c-extensions-rich-pointers.html
http://www.cplusplus-soup.com/2012/01/rich-pointers-frequently-asked.html
The proposal :
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2012/n3340.pdf
[/offtopic]