Subject: Re: [boost] [git] neglected aspects
From: Thomas Heller (thom.heller_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-02-12 04:00:42
On 02/12/2012 04:56 AM, Steven Samuel Cole wrote:
> Thomas Heller wrote:
>> On 02/11/2012 03:48 PM, Julian Gonggrijp wrote:
>>> Thomas Heller wrote:
>>>> ... Think of the VHDL model,
>>> Do you mean this? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VHDL
>> Yes, I mean the hardware description language.
> > ...
>> successfully passed all the tests, you start by getting down one level
>> in the abstraction, lets say RTL level (Register transfer level).
> huh ?!? hardware description language ?? VHDL ?? RTL ??
> can we please stay in software development here and use terms and
> metaphors that everyone can relate to ?
I am terribly sorry that this blows your mind.
This wasn't a metaphor. This was an example how testing is done in other
languages. Writing VHDL code is the same C++ code. It needs testing. All
I did was trying to find a real advantage for all this branching stuff.
If narrow mindedness and the failure of thinking out of the box is the
git way, then let me quote you: "--> yeah, thanks but no thanks."
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk