Subject: Re: [boost] [1.49.0] Release candidates available
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-02-21 03:05:41
On 20 Feb 2012 22:37, "Barend Gehrels" <barend_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> This is the correct one! Thanks!
> Great that it is solved so soon.
Ok, Beman will need to redo the release.
> I see. So indeed we can expect build problems starting from this
No. The problem is on trunk, the executable has a stricter parser which
causes it to reject file in release and existing versions of boost. Only
people using the trunk executable will have this issue and they already
affected. I guess it's in a file that isn't used by people running tests.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk