Subject: Re: [boost] Is there interest in portable integer overflow detection, with policy based handling?
From: John Bytheway (jbytheway+boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-02-22 14:04:34
On 22/02/12 02:00, Ben Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Antony Polukhin <antoshkka_at_[hidden]>wrote:
>> How fast is your library? Does it support unsigned long long int
>> overflow detection?
> The library is meta-programmed with respect to the data types involved in
> each overloaded math operation, taking advantage is performance savings,
> such as when both data types are unsigned (see my more complete performance
> response above to a previous email).
> Addition overflow detection for example involves a single subtract, along
> with from one to three compares.
Would you be open to providing assembly implementations to supplement
the existing portable implementation if there was demand and they were
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk