Subject: Re: [boost] [integer] Bug in int_t<65>
From: John Maddock (boost.regex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-02-24 11:58:22
> I was trying to instantiate a boost::int_t<65>::least and I didn't got
> an error. Unfortunately the size of the obtained type was 8.
> I think that there is an error in the meta-function class as there is a
> comparison without and with the sign bit in // **
> Please could this be fixed in trunk?
Confirmed, and I agree with you. Fixed in Trunk.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk