Subject: Re: [boost] [numeric] Applying trivial bugfix
From: Antony Polukhin (antoshkka_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-02-28 14:06:26
2012/2/28 Iain Denniston <iain.denniston_at_[hidden]>:
> Would it not then be a better idea to roll back to the old functionality and
> have an additional macro (BOOST_THROW_EXTENDED_EXCEPTION?) to provide the
> extended functionality the current macro provides?
> Additional configuration options to make BOOST_THROW_EXCEPTION ==
> BOOST_THROW_EXTENDED_EXCEPTION and vice versa would allow users to make a
> decision if the extra information is important to them and allow others to
> avoid the costs when required
After that, I would propose to replace all the "throw x" in all the
libraries with BOOST_THROW_EXCEPTION(x). This would close a lot of
feature requests, provide better support for compilations with
disabled exceptions and improve user control over the exceptions.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk