Subject: Re: [boost] [config] std::unique_ptr, std::ref detection?
From: John Maddock (boost.regex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-01 12:53:17
> BOOST_NO_0X_HDR_FUNCTIONAL - std lib doesn't have a complete
> of <functional>, MSVC and gcc/libstdc++ seem to have added all the new
> features here on mass, so this seems reasonable.
> BOOST_NO_0X_SMART_PTR - no shared_ptr and unique_ptr.
> BOOST_NO_0X_ATOMIC_SMART_PTR - no atomic operations on smart pointers.
> BOOST_NO_0X_ALLOCATOR - no C++0x allocator support (allocator_traits etc).
>0x? Shouldn't it be 11 by now?
Um, yes, it's just that we have all these 0X macros already and I'd like to
be consistent with existing practice, and don't much fancy changing all the
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk