Subject: Re: [boost] Review request: extended complex number library
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-11 08:35:03
On 11/03/12 13:16, Matthieu Schaller wrote:
> 220.127.116.11> If the result of a function is not mathematically defined or
> not in the range of representable values for its type, the behavior is
This is not one of those cases, since the result is indeed
mathematically defined and is representable as a perfectly normal value.
> De-normalized numbers are apparently not supported.
I don't see how denormalized numbers are related to this.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk