Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.ntree_container (bi_tree, quad_tree, oct_tree, etc ptr containers) Is there any interest in this?
From: pavel (paul.cpprules_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-11 13:28:03

 Daniel wrote on Sunday, March 11, 2012 at 0:04:28:
> That's not exactly a generic implementation, nor one that is STL-friendly
> (e.g., no iterators).

you are perfectly right

but i believe that this implementation can be almost trivially
integrated with a generic (read: template) interface

besides, i hardly see a kd tree or an octree as a (associative)

if you notice a grammar mistake or weird phrasing in my message
please point it out

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at