Re: [boost] interprocess with unordered_map

Subject: Re: [boost] interprocess with unordered_map
From: Joel (jdy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-18 16:07:16

> 2012/3/17 Ion Gaztañaga <igaztanaga <at> gmail.com>:
> > If we want to achieve direct comparison, Boost.Unordered needs to go
> > Boost.Intrusive or Boost.Multiindex route, and offer additional search
> > overloads that can find "equivalent keys":

Olaf van der Spek <ml <at> vdspek.org> writes:
> That route looks like a good one. Avoiding the need for expensive
> temps is great.

Perhaps map and flat_map need this as well?  Should bugs be filed?

Thanks!

Joel