Subject: Re: [boost] interprocess with unordered_map
From: Joel (jdy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-18 16:07:16
> 2012/3/17 Ion GaztaÃ±aga <igaztanaga <at> gmail.com>:
> > If we want to achieve direct comparison, Boost.Unordered needs to go
> > Boost.Intrusive or Boost.Multiindex route, and offer additional search
> > overloads that can find "equivalent keys":
Olaf van der Spek <ml <at> vdspek.org> writes:
> That route looks like a good one. Avoiding the need for expensive
> temps is great.
Perhaps map and flat_map need this as well? Should bugs be filed?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk