Subject: Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?
From: Sergey Popov (loonycyborg_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-19 18:31:44
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:34:06 -0400
Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> More attention from the community, more support, more tools work with
> it, more money behind it, more people will be familiar with it in the
> long run, etc., etc.
Both of hg and git have large enough communities so in this particular
case popularity alone cannot be deciding factor. Wrt support and tools
you're unlikely to notice much difference due to diminishing returns.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk