Subject: Re: [boost] [lambda] Can't get simple lambda working...
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-20 11:46:30
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Robert Dailey <rcdailey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> A side note not directly related to your issue: Consider using
>> instead of Boost.Lambda (Boost.Lambda is "obsolete" and it was replaced by
>> the more powerful Boost.Phoenix).
> Ok. Is it available in version 1.48? Why was boost.lambda deprecated in
> favor of this new library?
For this code I'd just use a plain old for loop.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk