Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?

Subject: Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?
From: Sergiu Dotenco (sergiu.dotenco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-22 13:07:11

On 3/22/2012 4:02 PM, Mathias Gaunard wrote:
> On 20/03/12 14:06, Sergiu Dotenco wrote:
> 
>> Everything you described works in Mercurial as well, probably much
>> better.
> 
> It is a relatively new Mercurial feature, was originally an experimental
> extension, and was added for parity with Git.

What kind of experimental Mercurial extension are talking about?

> I'd rather choose the software that was designed for the good ideas than
> the one that copied them.

> Also "probably much better" is the kind of self-proclaimed facts you
> were criticising in other parts of the thread.

Except that I never declared that a fact. It's simply my opinion on this
matter which is also pretty obvious, isn't it?