Subject: Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-22 15:37:54
On 22 March 2012 17:17, Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> on Thu Mar 22 2012, Martin Geisler <mg-AT-aragost.com> wrote:
>> Julien Nitard <julien.nitard_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>>> It seems that everybody has heard of this magic... but nobody has
>>>> actually seen it, and nobody can remember where they read about it :)
>>> I do, in case somebody is interested. It's in the introduction to
>>> Mercurial wrote by Joel Spolski.that was posted here not so long ago.
>>> http://hginit.com/00.html paragraph "One more big conceptual difference".
>> Oh, yeah, that guide... :)
>> I'm afraid Joel didn't really know what he was talking about back when
>> he wrote that piece.
Wrt. git, the 'magic' certainly predates 'hg init'. For example, see
the second answer at:
I think it dates back to early git development, when people were
arguing about rename tracking. I think people might have read too much
into things like:
Or maybe got confused with the content tracking in 'git blame'. Or
things just get distorted as they are repeated.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk